History of Irrational Numbers

Irrational numbersare numbers that have a decimal expansion that neither shows periodicity (some sort of patterned recurrence) nor terminates. Let's look at their history.

Hippassus Metapontum, th的希腊哲学家e Pythagorean school of thought, is widely regarded as the first person to recognize the existence ofirrational numbers. Supposedly, he tried to use his teacher'sfamous theorem $a^{2}+b^{2}= c^{2}$to find the length of the diagonal of a unit square. This revealed that a square's sides are incommensurable with its diagonal, and this length cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers. Since the other Pythagoreans believed that only positive rational numbers could exist, what happened next has been the subject of speculation for centuries. In short, Hippassus may have died because of his discovery.

So, what did happen to Hippassus? No one will probably ever know for sure, but below are some better-known stories.

• Some believe that the Pythagoreans were so horrified by the idea of incommensurability that they threw Hippassus overboard on a sea voyage and vowed to keep the existence of irrational numbers a secret.
• Hippassus discovered irrational numbers, the Pythagoreans ostracized him, and the gods were so disgusted by his discovery that they scuttled his boat on the high seas.
• Hippassus发现了无理数,然后died on an ocean voyage as the result of a natural accident (the sea is a treacherous place). Nonetheless, his colleagues were still so displeased with his discovery that they wished they had been the ones to throw him overboard.

Another possibility is that none of the stories above are true, and they are tales invented and embellished through the ages to illustrate a pivotal moment in history.

However, if Hippassus did discover irrational numbers, it is not clear which method he used to do so. For the curious, the Brilliant summary page onrational numbersbuilds up toEuclid'sproof of the irrationality of $\sqrt{2}$. This is one way Hippassus might have done it. However, many scholars think Euclid's method (written 300 years after the time of Hippassus) is more advanced than what Hippassus would have been able to do.

Regardless of what actually happened, it is difficult to imagine a time when proving the existence of an irrational number was a moral transgression.

Humans have had numbers for at least all of recorded history. Our earliest basis for numbers and math derive from the practical need to count and measure things. It is intuitive to see how the positive, non-zero, natural numbers would arise "naturally" from the process of counting. It is also easy to see how measurement would present one with things that could not be divided into whole units, or whose dimensions were in-between a whole number. Inventing fractions made practical sense, as ratios of the natural numbers. Discovering the positive rational numbers was probably pretty intuitive.

Numbers may have originated from purely practical needs, but to the Pythagoreans, numbers were also the spiritual basis of their philosophy and religion. Pythagorean cosmology, physics, ethics, and spirituality were predicated on the premise that "all is number." They believed that all things--the number of stars in the sky, the pitches of musical scales, even the qualities of virtue--could be described by and comprehended through rational numbers.

This is a $19^\text{th}$century depiction of Pythagoreans celebrating sunrise (Fyodor Bronnikov). The Pythagoreans attributed mystical significance to their ability to perceive the presence of rational numbers in everything, be it a sunrise or a musical harmony.

One reason to think that positive rational numbers would form the basis for all things in the universe is that there is an infinite amount of them. Intuitively, it might seem reasonable that an infinite amount of numbers should be enough to describe anything that might exist. Along the number line, rational numbers are unfathomably “dense.” There is not much “space” between $\frac{1}{100000}$and $\frac{1}{100001}$, but if you ever needed to describe something between those two numbers you would have no problem finding a fraction between them.

The number line is infinitely dense with rational numbers. The existence of irrational numbers implies that despite this infinite density, there are still holes in the number line that cannot be described as a ratio of two integers.

The Pythagoreans had probably manually measured the diagonal of a unit square before. They probably regarded the measurement as an approximation that was close to a precise rational number that must be the true length of the diagonal. Before Hippassus, they had no reason to suspect that there are logically real numbers that in principle, not merely in practice, cannot be measured or counted to.

If you had believed that all numbers were rational numbers, and that rational numbers were the basis of all things in the universe, then having something that could not be expressed as the ratio of two integers would have been like discovering a gaping void in the universe. An irrational number was a sign of meaninglessness in what had seemed like an orderly world. The Pythagoreans wanted numbers to be something you could count on, and for all things to be counted as rational numbers. The discovery of an irrational number proved that there existed in the universe things that could not be comprehended through rational numbers, threatening not only Pythagorean mathematics, but their philosophy as well.